Select the wells you want to export and define the time range. For raw data, highlight «originals» under «as stored on IncuCyte». Go to «utilities» and select «export movie or image set». How to export image sets Open a dataset.
Timelapse Image Analyzer Software For ProcessingGet Started.I had been without an equatorial platform for my Dobson for a few weeks, but I was just in time to have a new platform more or less in working condition. And many other flavors , their extensions, and related software projects. This wiki is a community knowledge base for ImageJ and friends. ImageJ is open source software for processing and analyzing scientific images. Welcome to the ImageJ wiki.To zoom in on the image, mouse over the part of the image you want to blow up, and press the + (plus) key.Camera Mode: not set Video TimeWarp Timelapse Video Nightlapse Video. In the System section, look next to Installed memory (RAM). Click the Start button, right-click Computer, and then click Properties. Apple menu > About This Mac and look next to Memory.I like this semi-manual approach, as it gives you lots of control, and involves lots of fiddling around with image processing software. For this image I let WinJUPOS derotate each slightly sharpened stack I had selected to the same reference, and then I manually recombined all of those again in Photoshop, taking only the best (parts of) each stack. Server mdns.Processing this image all in all took about 5 hours, as I wanted to combine as many images as I could using WinJUPOS. ![]() I still have some recordings left to process from the night before, and I’m really curious to see the changes in the results from one day to the next as the clouds on Mars can be pretty dynamic!For this recording I used the ASI120MM monochrome camera (as usual) and some Baader color filters. Analyze signals using the sound card in your computer.Here is my latest result: Mars imaged on May 17 under pretty good conditions (well, for Dutch conditions of course). Draw the graph of a mathematical function with one variable with this tool. An application for viewing, editing and analysing chess games. Gathers data, and provide online statistical analysis to the manager. The little dark dot on the center left for example is a large shield volcano Ascraeus Mons peaking through some water ice clouds. Because the recordings I made were quite lengthy, and especially far apart in time, I used WinJUPOS to compensate for the planet rotation by derotating the stacked images. Using this technique, it is even possible to combine multiple recordings together to increase the signal to noise ratio (produce prettier images), or even get rid of some sharpening or diffraction related artifacts in high-contrast areas.Anyway, lots of cool stuff can be seen in this image of Mars. This is actually an often used ‘trick’ by planetary astrophotographers: not only do we perform lucky imaging within a recording, by letting AS!2 select and combine only the sharpest portions of frames, but also between recordings, where we basically select (or show!) only the best recordings out of hours of material.Mars rotates once in about 25 hours, but if you record using a monochrome camera every color after each other, there is a small color displacement between the channels when you turn the images into a color image. The best recordings were then processed more carefully using AS!2. To this end, I first let AS!2 quickly batch-process all recordings using just a single alignment point and then manually previewed and selected the resulting stacks. Whenever there is an opportunity to observe the night sky, you take it, even if you don’t really want to. But astrophotographers are weird people, especially when they live in areas where the number of good clear skies per year is astronomically (ha!) low. Anyway, here is the first part of the rather long story that will probably be completed in a year from now…I did not want to go outside, because I had to get up early the next morning and was already tired. I planned to post this story soon after the images were taken, but for some reason that never happened…. Today I will discuss an image of M42 that I made over a year ago on the night of November 18-19 2012. When I do that, I will try to tell just a little bit about how the image was made, and what it actually is that you are looking at. Tomorrow I was going to be tired.I pretty much never look through the telescope myself, but let a camera do that for me. The Moons of Jupiter looked very steady: the seeing was good. So I set up my telescope, connected the remote controller of the focuser, turned on the ventilator at the back of the telescope tube to force a temperature equilibrium, checked and corrected the alignment of the optics, and pointed the telescope to Jupiter. And that in turn meant the images would probably be good, and that I also was not going to get much sleep this night. It was also slightly foggy, which I did not like, because it meant the air was probably steady. How many sit ups should i do for this mac and cheese i ateThe planets also require more magnification, which means that you can only see them in high detail when the seeing is very good. The Orion Nebula was still too low at the horizon, so it did not make much sense to start imaging that, but generally I also prefer imaging planets as they are more dynamic. So I powered up my laptop, added the filter wheel, barlow, and camera, turned off the ventilator again because it can cause slight vibrations, and then started imaging Jupiter for the next three hours. Even Jupiter – whose light ‘only’ takes about 40 minutes to get here – is already enormous: Earth easily fits into the hundreds of years lasting storm on Jupiter – the Great Red Spot – and we could place more than half a million Earths on a straight line from here to Jupiter. That is where we can find the Orion Nebula.As you probably know, everything in space is huge. And then I noticed Orion, and in particular the fuzzy spot at the center of three stars making up the sword of the Hunter, close to the larger structure of the three stars making up its belt. The seeing was slowly getting worse as well, so I was pretty much done with Jupiter. It was still cold: there was a layer of ice on my telescope, I had to defog the secondary mirror a couple of times with a hair dryer, and my fingers were freezing. The brightest stars seem like just one star when viewed with the unaided eye.This image was made during the night in question with my 0.25 m Newton telescope. Anyway, you get the picture, there is plenty of space in space.But when we zoom in a little bit on just the center of the Orion Nebula, this is what we see:The bright center of the Orion Nebula. The Nebula itself is relatively closeby: light only takes 1200 years to get from there to here, our closest neighboring galaxy is 200 thousand times further away. These are young stars that have just been born.Another proplyd in the center of the field of view.A quick reminder for those interested in playing around with the latest AutoStakkert!2 lucky imaging software: there is a beta version of AutoStakkert!2 available at the AutoStakkert!2 beta websiteThe versions displayed on that site have not been tested a lot, but it generally works quite well and has interesting functionality such as: You can actually see protoplanetary disks here: disks of dense gas surrounding stars that have basically just been formed!Proplyds, or externally illuminated photo-evaporating protoplanetary disks in the core of the trapezium (the slightly elongated stars dots right next to the brightest star in the center). Keep checking this blog for a follow up! For now I’ll end with two close-ups of the image posted above. Because the longer you expose an image, the more our atmosphere has the chance to distort it.Unfortunately, this is where the story ends for now. But Hubble is also floating in space which means that it does not have to worry about the Earths atmosphere which has a tendency to distort images, especially when trying to view really tiny details, and even more so when using long exposure times. But for Hubble it is relatively easy: it has a huge 2.4 meter mirror that can collect light about 92 times faster (!) than my telescope can, and can resolve details that are at the very least 10 times smaller. I’m currently using 2.3.0. extended support for additional video formats using windows codecsAnd of course, all of these nicely hidden from view (but easily available) so if you just want an easy to use, fast and high quality lucky imaging stacking program, it is still there.If you find any problems with a beta, please let me know so I can fix them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorEric ArchivesCategories |